A. What would it look like (and would it be a good idea) if the US dealt with the issues of territories by reducing them?
1. Joining Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands (part of the same archipelago), and then annexing them to Hawaii. (Even joined together, the Marianas have less than half the population of Wyoming, so there's no way they would get statehood.)
2. Freeing American Samoa and having them join (currently) Independent Samoa. (Those born in AS aren't even citizens, they're nationals.)
3. Joining Puerto Rico and the USVI (think I've seen that as a proposal since the USVI has less than half the population of Wyoming, so there's no way they'd get statehood, though I can't find it anymore.) (As someone from PR, I believe in independence, but would be willing to accept statehood if the
Wyoming Rule were to be implemented, and doubly so if the Senate were abolished.)
4. Retroceding D.C. to Maryland (except the areas immediately surrounding the United States Capitol, the White House and the Supreme Court building, a "National Capital Service Area" as proposed in a 2008 bill.) Wiki:
District of Columbia retrocession
B. Just for a little fun, what if Virginia still held Bermuda, and South Carolina The Bahamas? What could life look like on the islands as part of US states?
C. What would life look like for the people of Maine IATL where they fully won the
Aroostook War? How many people and what towns would be added to Maine? (Hard to tell what the new boundaries would add, so it's pretty much impossible to do population estimates. Would Maine gain a district? Perhaps two under the
Wyoming Rule?) (What could it look like if Maine lost and was reduced in size? How many people/which towns would they lose? Would it be enough to lose a district?) (The difference in New Hampshire seems small enough to ignore, but does losing that little chunk of territory change anything for them? (Add in the Machias Seal Island for Maine for fun. Doesn’t add any permanent population other than 2 rotating lighthouse keepers and occasional students and researchers, but does extend Maine’s waters.)
D. Finally, there's the issue of
Alaska and its boundary dispute. Due to the size, we could be talking about large territory transfers , yet minuscule population transfers. What would both extremes look like for Alaska/British Columbia in terms of population/towns, and perhaps access to water? (At least on the BC side, they’d gain Juneau, and Ketchikan, though there don’t seem to be any similar gains on the Alaskan side.)
(The main question is the first one, but if anyone can answer the other three, that would be great!)